PeeDei Sealed Monitor | |||
|
|||
|
|||
The woofer has a gently rising response. So trying to target an appropriate value for the big inductor took some trial and error. I tried 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 mH versions. Based on the prototypes, I thought the 2.0 gave the best balance of bass and midrange. The L/C components helped with phase and dropped the 5k peak down quite a bit. Listening Impressions After building the pair Xavier and I listened to them for an afternoon. The final product is well worth the effort. Sealed box bass sounds so natural and balanced. While the sims suggest F3 = 60 Hz, the PeeDei sound much fuller than the specs indicate. The ND-28 doesn't have quite the ultimate sparkle of the Vifa I used in the Veepers it is emminently capable and "listenable" without fatigue. Overall these are very well balanced, image beautifully, and are capable of handling just about any genre and mastering quality we threw at them. They don't get down to the bottom end of synth bass, but do benefit more from the shallow rolloff and room reenforcement. It's hard to say what the baffle step is on these, I'd guess maybe 4 db with sensitivity in the 84-85 db range. Side by side with the Veepers, I'd be hard pressed to pick a winner. They are "different", the Veepers are a bit more forward and revealing, the PeeDei's are smoother, a bit warmer, and less "picky". |
|||